Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Review: Deeply Offensive & Utterly Untrue (Version 1.0)

Deeply Offensive & Utterly Untrue is Version 1.0’s inquiry into the Cole inquiry. Distilling an 8500-page document into an engaging hour and a half of theatre can’t have been easy, but that is what this unique company has achieved. The play was first performed in the depths of Carriage Works’ Bay 20 in Sydney, and what we see here with the touring production is an expansion of that work. I saw the show twice in its original production, and was very excited when I heard it was coming to Wollongong, not least of all because it is a shining example of hard work in the independent theatre scene paying off. Version 1.0 have been recognised, as of last year, as a key arts organization and receive triennial funding. They make one realise that all the mock grant applications we do at uni are perhaps significantly more important than our other assessments.

The events discussed are astounding. At the same time as John Howard was declaring that a war with Iraq was necessary to dethrone a cruel and harsh dictator, AWB was paying up to $300 million in kickbacks to the Iraqi government. Aside from analysing the inquiry itself, the first point that this play is trying to make by its very existence, is that these are massive events which have been swept under the carpet very quickly. Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Here we are talking about hypocrisy on a much larger scale going unpunished.

Version 1.0’s handling of the material of the inquiry is deft. Stagings of many interviews and speeches from the inquiry and surrounding media are combined with direct discussion of the issues by the cast, which together bring lucidity to the proceedings. Clarity is a key point in this production. At all times, the details of those being interviewed are available on screens either side of the stage (this is quite amusing when the performers are talking as themselves), the images are all clear and crisp, and even when a scene is accompanied by large scale AV one is never put off balance. What I find interesting about the form of the work, especially as I am currently working on a piece of verbatim theatre, is that although Version 1.0 use much of the exact text of the inquiry document, as we enter the theatre we are reminded by messages on the video screens that “every word in this performance is true”, the words are so obviously interpreted that one could never define it as a verbatim work. The example that sticks out in my mind is the interview with John Howard that is accompanied by those playing the interviewers stroking him and offering him wine. The company makes no claims to objectivity, yet I think those who label their style as “documentary theatre” should be wary of the connotations of the term.

With the exception of a few moments that have lost their impact, such as the reference to Mohamed Haneef’s SIM card, the work still feels quite fresh in spite of its age. The newly added material, including speeches from Kevin Rudd and quotes from David Marr’s recent assessment of the events assist in achieving this relevancy. Unfortunately, I think that some of the beauty of the piece was lost by placing it in a more traditional proscenium arch theatre, which lacked the depth of the Carriage Works space. Not only did it mean that moments of the piece which had previously been separated merged together in the centre of the stage, it also meant that the mechanical elements of the theatre were hidden in the fly gallery and side stage, rather than laid bare for all to see which took away from the impact of the clever use of space. Whereas in Carriage Works, you could see all the elements from start, which made it more startling when they surprised you with a sandbag you hadn’t expected, or a light that appeared out of seemingly nowhere, here these moment felt like traditional theatre tricks. The venue also created some practical problems in terms of visibility. I was quite far back in the theatre and found it quite difficult to read the smaller screens either side of the stage, which at times contained important information. However, these are the problems one faces with a touring production, and for anyone who hadn’t seen the original I am sure that these would not have factored into one’s engagement with the work.

I could not finish this review without mentioning my favourite moment of the play, that being the live feed of a mouse attempting to eat cheese off a mouse trap being projected from two different angles from the two massive screens which dominated the set. The superb video elements are the work of Sean Bacon who has seamlessly integrated the visuals into the production through these two large screens, the two smaller screens already mentioned, and the more subtle television screen at the back of the stage showing footage of the trial of Saddam Hussein. Version 1.0 have a knack for using vision to offer fresh perspectives, as they do for breaking down complex documents into digestible theatre.

- Simon


Sanja said...

The mouse was your favourite moment? All the Stephen as Downer moments still make me grin when I think about them.

Not being able to see all the mechanics didn’t bother me at all, I knew they weren’t hiding them intentionally and from where I was sitting I could pretty much see everything that would have been hidden if I’d been further back or more to one side. I still think the use of the space was clever in many ways. Nothing stuck out at me as a traditional theatre trick at any point, though my idea of “traditional” theatre tricks might be very different to yours.

Having said that, I really wish I could have seen it in a CarriageWorks bay… I think I would have enjoyed the depth.

The Perf said...

Stephen Klinder's performance was pretty fantastic in all capacities. I think I enjoyed him playing with the toy car as much as I enjoyed Downer, which was quite a lot.

For me there was a dramaturgical link between the exposing of the theatrical techniques and the way they were exposing the problems of the inquiry. Perhaps that was a bit much, but there was something about it that didn't sit right with me at IPAC.

- Simon

Anonymous said...

порно с малолетками онлайн видео http://free-3x.com/ скачать порно видео школьницы 3 free-3x.com/ подростки в порно видео с молодежью онлайне [url=http://free-3x.com/]free-3x.com[/url]

Anonymous said...


[url=http://membres.multimania.fr/soutyen/]best cigarettes to buy [/url]
cheapest staes to buy cigarettes buy cigarettes with paypal buy cigarettes in delaware
[url=http://membres.multimania.fr/thorwcl/]cheap cigarettes buy online now [/url]
buy value pride cigarettes buy online cigarette cigarettes buy dreams cigarettes
[url=http://membres.multimania.fr/ysleehf/]where to buy cambridge cigarettes [/url]
maldova cigarettes mail order buy cigarettes cheep buy cigarette packaging supplys
[url=http://membres.multimania.fr/enemgne/]buy carlton cigarettes [/url]
fake cigarettes buy buying cigarette supplies online buy cigarettes from switzerland
[url=http://membres.multimania.fr/dnnuctg/]buy gauloise cigarettes [/url]
buying cigarette supplies online order foreign cigarettes online 19 to buy cigarettes
[url=http://utenti.multimania.it/peexcal/]buying cigarettes internet [/url]
buy roll in cigarette filter tips buying tax free cigarettes where to buy e cigarette
[url=http://utenti.multimania.it/haisjzu/]mail order cigarettes seneca ny [/url]
order newport cigarettes online splash cigarettes buy online ordering cigarettes from canada

Sildenafil said...

I think that blogs like this are interesting because has a lot of good information for us and we can learn while we are reading.

Viagra said...

I think that this version is very good, this version is not the best of all, but it has good parts.